Critics
say the smokes are designed for youngsters; big tobacco denies the
charge
By Kathleen Doheny, HealthDay Reporter
SUNDAY, Jan. 15 (HealthDay News)
The names sound like they belong on yogurt, chewing
gum or candy bars.
But Twista Lime, Warm Winter Toffee and Midnight
Berry are new flavors of cigarettes. And critics say they are actually
thinly veiled efforts by the U.S. tobacco industry to entice children
take up smoking.
Tobacco makers strongly refute that, but the
critics have their doubts and advise parents to contact their legislators
to urge a ban on the smokes.
It's necessary, experts add, to help convince
kids not to take up the habit. That's critical, according to the
American Lung Association, because tobacco use primarily begins
in early adolescence -- one-third of all smokers had their first
cigarette by the age of 14.
Flavored cigarettes date back to about 1999.
But the last few years have seen a "big push" in their
marketing, said Paul Billings, vice president of national policy
and advocacy for the American Lung Association.
Several states have introduced legislation to
ban the flavored smokes, said Billings, including Connecticut, Illinois,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Texas and West Virginia.
"We strongly support this legislation,"
he added.
The timing of the new flavored products is hardly
coincidental, a group of Harvard researchers contended in a report
in the November/December 2005 issue of the journal Health Affairs.
"The proliferation of new flavored brands
comes at a time when advertising and marketing restrictions have
made it more difficult to target young smokers," said the researchers,
led by Carrie Carpenter, a Harvard School of Public Health research
analyst.
She was referring to the terms of the 1998 Master
Settlement Agreement between the state attorneys general and major
U.S. tobacco manufacturers. The tobacco makers agreed to change
the way their products are marketed and pay the states an estimated
$206 billion. The companies also agreed to finance a $1.5 billion
anti-smoking campaign, open documents previously kept secret, and
disband trade groups the attorneys general said conspired to conceal
damaging research from the public.
Carpenter's team pored over internal tobacco
industry documents as well as U.S. patents, both awarded and pending
applications.
"Now we have evidence from the documents
that this concept of flavored cigarettes has been associated with
new and younger smokers," Carpenter said, referring to what
she described as a 1988 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco report, identifying
young adult smokers as the company's "most critical strategic
need." Because aftertaste was mentioned by young smokers as
a concern, one of the methods to counteract the problem is the "pellet
technology" used in some flavored products. The pellet is inserted
in the filter area to provide for controlled release of the filter,
she said.
"There could be health risks associated
with the pellet," said Carpenter.
But a spokesman for the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company said the target for the new product is not minors.
"Our one and only audience, regardless of
brand or style, is legal-age adults who have made the decision to
smoke," Fred McConnell, manager of communications for R.J.
Reynolds, said.
"We don't want children to smoke,"
he added, "not only because it is illegal to sell to minors
in every state, but also because children lack the maturity of judgment
to assess the inherent health risks of smoking."
Billings suggests parents warn their underage
children about the health risks of smoking, and lobby their lawmakers
to outlaw the flavored smokes.
Source by : http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/359590/flavored_cigarettes_the_next_battleground/index.html
|